Welcome to Yantai Dasteck Chemicals Co., Ltd. English/中文/Tiếng Việt
Home > FAQ > Dosage When Replacing Sodium Hydrosulfite with Thiourea Dioxide (FAS) — Archived Version

Dosage When Replacing Sodium Hydrosulfite with Thiourea Dioxide (FAS) — Archived Version

Direct Answer

Archived version: This page retains an earlier FAQ variant. Please also check the current answer linked below.

Direct Answer No single figure applies, but one starting point is defensible: dose at one third to one half of the sodium hydrosulfite weight, then adjust on the basis of a bench trial.

Question 1: How much thiourea dioxide should be used when replacing sodium hydrosulfite?

The equal-reducing-equivalent calculation sets the theoretical floor. US Patent 5,958,184 states the reducing-equivalent ratio between the two compounds: 1 kg of pure sodium hydrosulfite corresponds to 0.62 kg of thiourea dioxide. The bleaching examples in the same patent follow that direction, pairing 0.55% thiourea dioxide with 1.1% of 85% sodium hydrosulfite powder. Converted to commercially available 85% hydrosulfite, the theoretical weight ratio is about one half.

In working processes the spread is much wider: published figures range from one half to one tenth, depending on the process, temperature, alkali charge and dye class (see Question 3 and the appendix). For most textile wet processes, one third to one half of the hydrosulfite weight is a sound starting point. Pulp bleaching runs the other way; at an equal dose, thiourea dioxide delivers higher brightness.

Question 2: Why is it not a weight-for-weight replacement?

Three reasons.

First, the reducing equivalents per unit of mass differ. The molecular weight of thiourea dioxide is 108.12 and that of sodium hydrosulfite is 174.11 (PubChem CID 61274, CID 24489). The hydrolysis equations given in US 5,958,184 show that each molecule yields an equal amount of H₂SO₂ in alkaline solution:

(NH₂)₂CSO₂ + H₂O → (NH₂)₂CO + H₂SO₂

Na₂S₂O₄ + H₂O → Na₂SO₃ + H₂SO₂

Equal moles therefore mean equal reducing equivalents. At equal weight, thiourea dioxide supplies about 61% more moles and correspondingly more reducing equivalents.

Second, sodium hydrosulfite is lost to air oxidation in hot alkaline baths. A study of batchwise vat dyeing found that the concentration of sodium hydrosulfite was considerably affected by the amount of air in the dyeing machine. Thiourea dioxide is a latent reducing agent with controlled release, so that loss is proportionally smaller.

Third, commercial purity differs. Textile-grade sodium hydrosulfite is typically 85%, whereas thiourea dioxide is normally at least 98%.

One caveat: we did not locate a citable, authoritative percentage for the effective utilisation rate of sodium hydrosulfite. The literature supports the qualitative finding that air oxidation is the main loss pathway, so this document does not quote a utilisation figure.

Question 3: How much is used in each process?

The table below collects measured dosages from published papers and patents by process. The figures in a row come from different sources rather than from a single trial; use each row with the conditions noted.

ProcessSodium hydrosulfiteThiourea dioxideSubstitution ratio
Polyester reduction clearing2 to 3 g/L with 1 to 3 g/L caustic soda1 g/L (optimum)about 1/2 to 1/3
Reactive-dye stripping, cotton8 g/L (optimum); NaOH 5 g/L, 100 °C, 30 min4 g/L (optimum); stripping efficiency 86% dark, 91% light1/2, with higher stripping efficiency than hydrosulfite (81% / 87%)
Indigo reduction3.5 g/L at 60 °C with 5 to 10 g/L caustic soda1.5 to 3.5 g/L at 80 °C with 7.5 to 10 g/L caustic sodaabout 1/2 to 1
Vat dyeing, winch (combined with hydrosulfite)reference = 11/101/10
Wood pulp reductive bleachingdosed at equal reducing equivalents (example: 1.1% of 85% powder)example 0.55% (equal equivalent)about 1/2
DIP bleaching0.1 to 1.0% (same dose series)0.1 to 1.0%at an equal dose, thiourea dioxide is about 2 ISO points higher in brightness
Dasteck technical comparison (31 July 2019)15 g/L (85% commercial)5 g/L (99% commercial)1/3

Question 4: Is adjusting the dosage on its own enough?

At least four conditions must move together with the dosage; otherwise a correctly calculated dose still fails in practice.

Temperature. In the indigo comparison, sodium hydrosulfite reached its optimum at 60 °C whereas thiourea dioxide required 80 °C. Carrying a low-temperature hydrosulfite process straight over will understate the performance of thiourea dioxide.

Alkali charge. In the same data set, sodium hydrosulfite was paired with 5 to 10 g/L caustic soda and thiourea dioxide with 7.5 to 10 g/L. The alkali cannot be cut in step with the reducing agent. For polyester reduction clearing, the published recipe pairs 2 to 3 g/L sodium hydrosulfite with 1 to 3 g/L caustic soda.

Order of addition. Add the alkali first, then the reducing agent. In weakly acidic solution thiourea dioxide is oxidised to formamidine sulfonic acid and loses its reducing power; this is already noted on our website technical page (dasteck.com/faq-what-is-fas.html).

Air ingress. The concentration of sodium hydrosulfite in a hot alkaline bath is strongly affected by the amount of air in the machine. The same applies after switching to thiourea dioxide: it is a controlled-release reducing agent, but it is still oxygen-sensitive.

Appendix: published and measured data

ItemValue or findingSource
Formula and molecular weightThiourea dioxide CH₄N₂O₂S, 108.12; sodium dithionite Na₂S₂O₄, 174.11PubChem CID 61274, CID 24489
Reducing-equivalent mass ratio1 kg pure sodium hydrosulfite = 0.62 kg thiourea dioxide; worked example 0.55% against 1.1% of 85% powder. The patent prints the ratio as TUDO:Na₂S₂O₄ = 1:0.62 (TUDO is the patent's abbreviation for thiourea dioxide); the direction follows its worked examplesUS5958184A
Hydrolysis in alkaliEach molecule yields an equal amount of H₂SO₂US5958184A
Polyester reduction clearingHydrosulfite 2 to 3 g/L (caustic soda 1 to 3 g/L); thiourea dioxide optimum 1 g/LJournal paper, 2021
Reactive-dye strippingThiourea dioxide 4 g/L: 86% dark, 91% light; hydrosulfite 8 g/L: 81% dark, 87% lightAJER, 2018
Indigo reduction3.5 g/L hydrosulfite at 60 °C, or 1.5 to 3.5 g/L thiourea dioxide at 80 °CJournal paper, 2014
Vat dyeing, winchUsed 1:10 with hydrosulfite; one tenth of the hydrosulfite weightChina Cotton Textile Association, 2015
Wood pulp reductive bleaching0.1 to 2.0% on oven-dry pulp; 0.75% raised brightness by 10.2 points (GE)US3384534A
DIP reductive bleachingThiourea dioxide and hydrosulfite at the same 0.1 to 1.0% dose; thiourea dioxide about 2 ISO points higher in brightnessKTAPPI, 2015
Equal-equivalent bleachingTMP: thiourea dioxide 0.55% and 85% hydrosulfite 1.1% both reached 55.9%; DIP: thiourea dioxide 0.27% reached 72.0%, hydrosulfite 0.55% reached 69.5%US5958184A
Hydrosulfite in hot alkaliAir in the dyeing machine markedly affects hydrosulfite concentrationJournal paper, 2000
Effective utilisation percentageNo citable authoritative figure locatedn/a

Sources

ItemSourceType
Formula and molecular weightPubChem CID 61274 (thiourea dioxide); PubChem CID 24489 (sodium dithionite)Official database
Reducing-equivalent ratio, hydrolysis equations, pulp and DIP comparative examplesUS5958184A, Process for producing thiourea dioxideUS patent
Wood pulp bleaching dosage and brightnessUS3384534A, Bleaching of wood pulps with thiourea dioxideUS patent
Polyester reduction clearing dosageEffective reduction clearing parameters involving alternative reducing agent (2021), DOI 10.54693/piche.04916Journal paper
Reactive-dye stripping on cottonPerformance Evaluation of Hydrose and Thiourea Dioxide as Stripping Agents for Reactive Dyes, AJER 7(2), 2018Journal paper
Indigo reduction dosage and temperatureOptimization of indigo dyeing with sodium hydrosulfite or thiourea dioxide as reductant (2014)Journal paper
Vat dyeing ratioHow to dye cotton fabric with vat dyes, China Cotton Textile Association (2015)Industry association
DIP bleaching comparisonThe effect of bleaching reagents on bleachabilities of DIP and environmental loads, KTAPPI 47(1), 2015, DOI 10.7584/ktappi.2015.47.1.066Journal paper
Hydrosulfite behaviour in hot alkaliDecomposition Behavior of Sodium Hydrosulfite in Batchwise Vat Dyeing (2000)Journal paper
Reduction potentials -1230 mV / -1080 mV, general 1/5 dosage, 15 g/L against 5 g/LThiourea Dioxide vs Sodium Hydrosulphite, Dasteck website (31 July 2019)Company material
Order of addition (alkali first)Dasteck website technical page (dasteck.com/faq-what-is-fas.html)Company material

All sources were consulted on 19 September 2026. Patent and journal figures are published values; confirm by bench trial before applying them to a specific process.

Reference links

  1. PubChem CID 61274, thiourea dioxide — https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/61274
  2. PubChem CID 24489, sodium dithionite — https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/24489
  3. US5958184A, Process for producing thiourea dioxide — https://patents.google.com/patent/US5958184A/en
  4. US3384534A, Bleaching of wood pulps with thiourea dioxide — https://patents.google.com/patent/US3384534A/en
  5. Effective reduction clearing parameters involving alternative reducing agent (2021) — https://doi.org/10.54693/piche.04916
  6. Performance Evaluation of Hydrose and Thiourea Dioxide as Stripping Agents for Reactive Dyes, AJER 7(2), 2018 — https://www.ajer.org/papers/Vol-7-issue-2/ZF070201250258.pdf
  7. Optimization of indigo dyeing with sodium hydrosulfite or thiourea dioxide as reductant (2014) — http://caod.oriprobe.com/articles/46005670/Optimization_of_indigo_dyeing_with_sodium_hydrosul.htm
  8. How to dye cotton fabric with vat dyes, China Cotton Textile Association (2015) — http://ccta.org.cn/scytj/rdht/jssj/201503/t20150316_1921005.html
  9. The effect of bleaching reagents on bleachabilities of DIP and environmental loads, KTAPPI 47(1), 2015 — https://doi.org/10.7584/ktappi.2015.47.1.066
  10. Decomposition Behavior of Sodium Hydrosulfite in Batchwise Vat Dyeing (2000) — https://koreascience.kr/article/JAKO200011919993891.pub
  11. Thiourea Dioxide vs Sodium Hydrosulphite, Dasteck website (31 July 2019) — https://dasteck.com/News/99.html
  12. Dasteck website technical page — https://dasteck.com/faq-what-is-fas.html

Items to confirm before publishing (internal note, not for publication)

No.ItemNote
1Which substitution ratio to adopt externallyOur website News/99 (31 July 2019) states that generally only one fifth of the traditional reducing agent dosage is required, yet the technical comparison in the same article gives 15 g/L of 85% hydrosulfite against 5 g/L of 99% thiourea dioxide, that is one third. This draft follows the patent and literature and takes one third to one half as the main line, listing one fifth as our existing published figure. Please confirm the single external figure. To confirm
2Whether to publish an effective utilisation figureNo citable authoritative percentage was located, so this draft omits it. Publishing one would require dedicated testing or internal data. To confirm
3How to cite the reduction potential values-1230 mV against -1080 mV comes from News/99 and is marked as company material; no independent third-party source was found. To confirm
4Reference formatThis draft gives titles and links. If full author, volume and page details are needed, please specify the style (GB/T 7714 or APA). To confirm

Need a sample, COA, SDS or technical support? Contact Dasteck.