Direct answer
Of the three reducing agents commonly used in textiles and paper, thiourea dioxide is the only one that combines strong reducing power with no formaldehyde and no irritating odour. Sodium bisulfite is far too weak, Rongalite (sodium formaldehyde sulfoxylate) is strong enough but contains formaldehyde, and hydrosulfite is strong but has clear safety and logistics drawbacks.
Comparison
| Item | Thiourea dioxide | Sodium hydrosulfite | Sodium bisulfite | Rongalite |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reduction potential (approx.) | -1230 mV | -1080 mV | about -300 mV (weak) | strong, close to hydrosulfite |
| Typical use | Reduction clearing, stripping, machine cleaning, vat dyeing | Traditional reducing agent | Light reduction, dechlorination | Discharge printing |
| Odour | Odourless | Irritant sulphur dioxide | Faint | Releases formaldehyde on decomposition |
| Formaldehyde | None | None | None | Yes |
| Storage and transport | Sealed, cool, not above 25 °C | Water-reactive flammable gas; strict controls | Less demanding | Less demanding |
| End products | Urea + sodium sulphate | Sulphate | Sulphate | Formaldehyde + sulphate |
Which one to choose
Bottom line
For replacing hydrosulfite, thiourea dioxide has a clear advantage in performance and safety. No single reducing agent is best in every process, so selection should follow the application.
Sources
Reduction potentials are quoted from our technical material and vary with bath conditions; the rest reflects established industry practice.